Boringdots is in public beta. Things may change or break. Beta terms
Boringdots

Resources

Practical guides for better automation decisions. Start with one problem, use one rule, then decide what to build, delay, simplify, or document.

Start here

Why Automations Fail When You Automate Chaos

Most automation problems don't start inside the tool. They start in the workflow, the data, and the people. The hook article behind the Boringdots framework.

Business owners, builders, anyone who's been burned by an automation that broke after launch

Automation decisions

Happy Path Is Not Production

An automation that works on the happy path is a demo. The production system is everything it does when reality stops cooperating.

Builders shipping automations they expect to run unattended

Decision Ownership: Who Owns the Workflow Before You Automate

The most common reason an automation fails after launch is that no one owned the workflow before it was built. Four roles need to be explicit.

Managers, freelancers handing off to clients, in-house builders

RAG Should Not Be the Default Answer

Retrieval-augmented generation is the current default for any workflow that touches text. It shouldn't be. RAG is the right answer when input is genuinely fuzzy.

Developers, AI consultants, anyone building text-touching automations

ROI vs Safety: Two Different Automation Decisions

Most automation projects get killed by mixing two questions that should be answered separately. ROI is a money question. Safety is a risk question.

Business owners, operators, anyone deciding what to automate

Run the check before you build.

Operator turns the Boringdots method into structured checks for readiness, value, reliability, ownership, and handover.